Planning and societal context — The case of Belgrade, Serbia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problems of planning system and practice in Serbia have been concomitant with the overall institutional changes. Urban planning evolves in response to and by adjusting to the specific contexts and circumstances, namely political, socio-economic, and governing. The more extreme variations in planning practice and the response to the societal circumstances since 1989, offer rich opportunities for observing the relationships between planning and its broader context. Serbia is one of the six republics of the former Yugoslavia, which from the early 1990s disintegrated into five states: Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, and Serbia and Montenegro. The main characteristic of the 1990s was the re-centralization of government and the weakening of the constitutional role and planning authority of the local communes. The new planning practice was steered by a mixture of old habits, few institutional innovations and the social, economic and political turbulence of the transition period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it