MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2239992446 · doi:10.7146/grs.v54i1.16436

Nationalisme, disciplin og folkelighed i 1800-tallets Danmark

2003· article· en· W2239992446 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Niels Kayser Nielsen

Bibliographic record

VenueGrundtvig-Studier · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNationalismEnlightenmentPassionPassionsEnthusiasmDanishQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceHistoryAncient historyReligious studiesLawPoliticsPhilosophyTheologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nationalisme, disciplin og folkelighed i 1800-tallets Danmark[Nationalism, Discipline and ‘Folkelighed' in Nineteenth-Century Denmark]By Niels Kayser NielsenPhysical education in Denmark had its beginnings in the last quarter of the 18th century. During the 19th century, as a concomitant to the growing enthusiasm for nationalism, it spread widely among ‘folk’- orientated circles: physical education and gymnastics came to be counted among the instruments by which the population were roused and raised to a sense of nationhood within a comprehensive civilising endeavour. In this connection Grundtvigianism played no small role. It is the thesis of this article that this endeavour is an important but often overlooked factor in the record of Grundtvigian influence in 19th-century Danish society, and that the Grundtvigian view of gymnastics as a ‘folk’-orientated way of ridding society of an indifferent and unmanageable substratum had its roots in the rationalist enlightenment of the last quarter of the 18th century.The first Danish initiatives in this direction occurred in the provinces as a corollary of the work of the progressive landowners, and primarily of the brothers Christian Ditlev Reventlow and Johan Ludvig Reventlow on their estates of (respectively) Pederstrup on Lolland and Brahe Trolleborg in South Funen, as inspired by German philanthropic physical culture with which they had become acquainted in their youth. This culture had as one of its aims to inculcate a “moderation of the passions” by, among the rest, “corporal education”. It was believed that moral improvement would not get very far unless education had a firm corporeal anchorage.This thinking was overtaken in the first half of the 19th century by a more militarily orientated philosophy, represented particularly by V. F. Nachtegall and Frederik VI; but following the Three Years' War it was resumed within the Grundtvigian regime which, however, turned its back upon rigid militaristic discipline and an exclusively physically characterised training of the civil body, directing its effort instead towards conditioning of both soul and body, in recognition that they are intimately bound together. For better and for worse, therefore, the Grundtvigian tradition of popular education has much to thank Nachtegall and Frederik VI for.With the emergence of the rifle club movement, and with it a voluntary principle of physical culture, it became possible for militaristic self-discipline and idealistic self-sacrifice to go hand in hand, with nationalistic enthusiasm as a common denominator. Within this movement the interests of the state and the wishes of civilian society to have a hand in things could exist side by side. In this respect the Grundtvigians played an important role. And when in the period of the Provisional Finance Acts in the 1880s the rifle club movement was split, it was thanks not least to Grundtvigian lobbying that the parties could come together again in the 1890s. It was not in the interests of Grundtvigian circles that there should be any split within the cause of popular nationalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGrundtvig-StudierSame topicHistorical Influence and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207