Bibliographic record
Abstract
This issue of Communication, Politics & Culture is mainly about the relationship between what people might do with better broadband and the government policies designed to get it to them. It is less about the headlines the NBN has attracted for the past year, and more about smaller stories—getting infrastructure to distant, hard-to-serve communities that will probably never get fibre access networks; getting people interested in using better broadband; anticipating problems that might arise and proposing solutions; speculating about alternate futures and their relationship to communications histories. There’s a particular focus on broadband in non-metropolitan communities—in Canada, Australia’s Central Desert, the North Queensland city of Townsville and the island state, Tasmania—and on the kinds of services that have already migrated so sweepingly to online delivery (banking) or that are thought likely to be such transforming parts of the NBN world (health and education).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.031 | 0.026 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".