Degree of Hardening of Epoxy-Modified Mortars without Hardener in Tropical Climate Curing Regime
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies show that the epoxy resin will harden in the presence of calcium hydroxide from cement hydration process under steam curing. In this study, commercially available epoxy resin without any hardener was used as a polymeric admixture to prepare epoxy-modified mortars subjected to dry, and 5 day wet followed by dry curing in tropical environment. The mortars were prepared with a mass ratio of cement to fine aggregate 1:3, water-cement ratio of 0.48 and epoxy content of 5, 10, 15 and 20% of the cement. The tests conducted were workability, setting time, compressive strength, flexural strength, and degree of hardening of epoxy resin. The results of the study show that the optimum epoxy content that produced the highest strength was 10% under wet-dry curing. However, the degree of epoxy hardening starts to decrease with an increase in epoxy content above 10%. It was also found that a significant improvement in strength development is achieved along with additional dry curing period due to gradually hardening reaction of epoxy resin with cement hydrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".