MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A New Information-Theoretic Based Ica Algorithm For Blind Signal Separation

2003· article· en· W2247019900 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computers and Applications · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndependent component analysisBlind signal separationComputer scienceGaussianAlgorithmNonlinear systemFunction (biology)SIGNAL (programming language)ExponentPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThe typical information-theoretic approaches such as INFO MAX and MMI perform independent component analysis (ICA) by using a fixed nonlinearity function. Consequently, they can only separate either sub-Gaussian or super-Gaussian source signals, but not both. This article considers a flexible nonlinearity function that is a single polynomial term with the exponent learnable. The separation ability of this function is analysed, and a new ICA algorithm is proposed. The experiments have shown that this algorithm can successfully separate the mixture of sub-Gaussian and super-Gaussian sources.Key Words: Independent component analysisblind signal separationflexible nonlinearity functionsub-Gaussiansuper-Gaussian sources Additional informationNotes on contributorsY.-M. CheungYiu-ming Cheung received Ph.D. degree in computer science and engineering from the Chinese University of Hong Kong in 2000. Currently, he is Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University His research interests include independent component iz analysis, multivariate data clustering analysis, radial basis function networks, time series analysis, portfolio management, and automated trading system.L. XuLei Xu (IEEE Fellow) is a Professor of Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK). He is also a full Professor at Peking University, and an adjunct Professor at three other universities in China and UK. After receiving his Ph.D. from Tsinghua University in early 1987, he joined Peking University, where he became one of ten university-level exceptionally promoted young associate professors in 1988 and further been exceptionally promoted to a full Professor in 1992. During 1989-1993, he worked at several universities in Finland, Canada and USA, including Harvard and MIT. He joined CUHK in 1993 as a Senior Lecturer and then took the current professor position since 1996.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it