MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2248162944 · doi:10.2495/data030381

A generic Data Mart architecture to support Web mining

2003· article· en· W2248162944 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Data Mining · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSession (web analytics)Web miningTable (database)World Wide WebTask (project management)Web pageArchitectureInformation retrievalDimension (graph theory)Web mappingWeb navigationData miningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visits in a Web site leave behind important information about the behavior of the visitors. This information is stored in log files, which can contain many registers but part of them do not contain relevant information. In such cases, user behavior analysis turns out to be a complex and time-consuming task. In order to analyze Web site visits, the relevant information has to be filtered and studied in an efficient way. We introduce a generic Data Mart architecture to support advanced Web mining, which is based on a Star model and contains the relevant historical data from visits to the Web site. Its fact table contains various additive measures that support the intended data mining tasks, whereas the dimension tables store the parameters necessary for such analysis, e.g. period of analysis, range of pages within a session. This generic repository allows one to store different kinds of information derived from visits to a Web site, such as e.g. time spent on each page in a session and sequences of pages in a session. Since the Data Mart has a flexible structure that allows one to add other interesting parameters describing visitors navigation, it provides a flexible research platform for various kinds of analysis. Based on these sources, user behavior can be characterized and stored in user behavior vectors that serve as input for data mining. For example, similar visits can be grouped together and typical user behavior can be identified, which allows improvement of Web sites and an understanding of user behavior. The application of the presented methodology to the Web site of a Chilean university shows its benefits. We analyzed visits to the respective Web site and could identify clusters of typical visitors. The analysis of these clusters is used for improved online marketing activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0090.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it