Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Kernel Mean Matching (KMM) is an elegant algorithm that produces density ratios between training and test data by minimizing their maximum mean discrepancy in a kernel space. The applicability of KMM to large-scale problems is however hindered by the quadratic complexity of calculating and storing the kernel matrices over training and test data. To address this problem, this paper proposes a novel ensemble algorithm for KMM, which divides test samples into smaller partitions, estimates a density ratio for each partition and then fuses these local estimates with a weighted sum. Our theoretical analysis shows that the ensemble KMM has a lower error bound than the centralized KMM, which uses all the test data at once to estimate the density ratio. Considering its suitability for distributed implementation, the proposed algorithm is also favorable in terms of time and space complexities. Experiments on benchmark datasets confirm the superiority of the proposed algorithm in terms of estimation accuracy and running time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it