Effects of Cultural Landscape Conservation and Utilization Activities on Residential Value Cognition -Shiga Prefecture Takashima City as a case-
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Japan, the law for the conservation of cultural landscapes was established in 2005. 43 areas are selected as “Important Cultural Landscapes” by the Minister of Education. Cultural Landscapes are strongly influenced by the local people's lives and livelihoods. Therefore, residents’ participation is essential to promote the conservation of cultural landscapes. However, the residents’ perception of cultural landscape value is not so high, and that cause the problems to proceed the activity of landscape conservation and local revitalization. Therefore, this study aim to clarify the effects and the problems of conservation activity from the view point of residents’ participation and recognition toward Cultural Landscapes. We did Hearing survey with the municipal office and community organizations in Takashima City. As results, it is needed for many residential people to share the image of landscape creation and its need at the stage of before making the conservation plan of important cultural landscape. Moreover, through the half-forcibly participation of conservation activity organized by traditional council, residential people can foster awareness toward the conservation activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it