Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessGovernanceFeb 2009Aid Effectiveness and GovernanceThe Good, the Bad and the UglyAuthors/Editors: Daniel KaufmannDaniel KaufmannSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X-11_1_26SectionsAboutPDF (0.3 MB) ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Good governance and political corruption should be considered when aid flows to governments. Previous articleNext article FiguresreferencesRecommendeddetailsCited byMillennium Aid, Trade, and Development4 May 2022Why Help North Korea? Foreign Aid to North Korea and Its Determinants, 2002–2018 *Pacific Focus, Vol.36, No.215 August 2021Financing Sustainable Development in AfricaDecentralization, Participatory Planning, and the Anthropocene in Indonesia, with a Case Example of the Berugak Dese, Lombok, Indonesia4 October 2017Aid and Its Impact on the Donor’s Export Industry: The Dutch CaseThe European Journal of Development Research, Vol.29, No.414 October 2016Governance and management for better aid effectiveness: a donor country’s perspectiveInternational Review of Public Administration, Vol.22, No.123 March 2017The Role of International Development in Reimagining the Indus Basin21 October 2016Does German Development Aid boost German Exports and German Employment? A Sectoral Level AnalysisJahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Vol.236, No.12 July 2016Corruption and the Nigerian Development QuagmireJournal of Developing Societies, Vol.31, No.4Trends and Challenges of Aid Effectiveness: The Rise of AsiaMulti-Dimensional Country Evaluation for Global Sourcing ConceptsMaking serious measures: numerical indices, peer review, and transnational actor-networksJournal of International Relations and Development, Vol.15, No.416 September 2011Panacea, placebo, or poison? The impact of development aid on growthCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, Vol.32, No.1Mikrofinanzierung in der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit – Bildungsunternehmertum am Beispiel der Opportunity Microschools View Volume 11Issue 1February 2009Page: 26-29ISSN: 1020-797X Copyright & Permissions Related RegionsAfricaEast Asia & PacificLatin America & CaribbeanRelated CountriesItalyLiberiaPhilippinesZimbabweRelated TopicsGovernancePrivate Sector Development KeywordsACCOUNTABILITYAID EFFECTIVENESSANTICORRUPTIONCIVIL SOCIETYCORRUPTIONCORRUPTION CONTROLCORRUPTION PROBLEMSFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONSGOOD GOVERNANCEGOVERNANCE RATINGSINTERNATIONAL AIDMISGOVERNANCENATIONAL LAWSPOLITICAL DIMENSIONSPOLITICAL INFLUENCEPOLITICAL LEADERSPOOR GOVERNANCEPOVERTY ALLEVIATIONPUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENTTRANSPARENCY PDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it