MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2255379265

The Merit of Not Making Merit

2010· article· en· W2255379265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeoul journal of Korean studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEurasian Exchange Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEliteBuddhismBureaucracyCapital (architecture)Gender studiesHistoryPolitical scienceSociologyPoliticsDevelopment economicsEconomic historyAncient historyLawEconomicsArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The period of Mongol overlordship during the late Kory? period witnessed the influx of an unprecedented number of non-traditional elements into the central bureaucracy. These nontraditional recruits to the old system tried to partake in the culture of the great descent groups of the capital and thus present themselves as equals of these great families. As they lacked both hereditary social status and a long and illustrious history of producing central officeholders, these men from nontraditional backgrounds tended to seek recourse in Buddhism, which for centuries served as the primary locus of the capital-based elite’s identity as great families. But the capital-based elite were beset by a serious fiscal crisis that threatened their very livelihood during the late Kory?. As a result, the late Kory? elite became increasingly aware of and concerned about the material riches of Buddhism. This heightened attention and not the purported decadence of Buddhism played an important role in Buddhism’s fall from its privileged position among the Kory? elite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it