Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we show that the Michelson–Morley experiment demonstrates that the light velocity is not constant. We use Newton’s approach, treat light as a vector, and apply parallelogram law, to compute all light velocities. Since light travels different distances with different velocities, we compute the phase angles of two light beams to establish the null result.VC 2014 Physics Essays Publication. [http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-27.1.134] Resume: Dans cet article, nous prouvons que l’experience de Michelson–Morley demontre que la vitesse de la lumiere n’est pas constante. Nous utilisons l’approche de Newton, traitons la lumiere comme un vecteur et appliquons la regle du parallelogramme afin de calculer toutes les vitesses de la lumiere. Sachant que la lumiere parcourt differentes distances a differentes vitesses, nous calculons les angles de phase de deux faisceaux lumineux pour etablir le resultat nul.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".