MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2263505657 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2014.1138

Robust stochastic stability and delayed‐state‐feedback stabilisation of uncertain Markovian jump linear systems with random time delays

2015· article· en· W2263505657 on OpenAlexaff
Li Qiu, Yang Shi, Bugong Xu, Fengqi Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Markov processLinear matrix inequalityMathematicsStability (learning theory)Full state feedbackRobust controlLinear systemLyapunov functionState (computer science)Markov chainController (irrigation)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationControl systemControl (management)Nonlinear systemEngineeringAlgorithmStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of robust stochastic stability and delayed‐state‐feedback stabilisation of uncertain Markovian jump linear systems with random Markov delays is investigated. Based on the Lyapunov stability theory and robust analysis techniques, some robust stochastic stability criteria are derived in terms of linear matrix inequalities. Robust delayed‐state‐feedback controllers that stochastically stabilise the uncertain Markovian jump linear systems is also proposed. The state variable on the controller is assumed to be dependent on the Markov delay that has uncertain transition probabilities. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Control Theory and ApplicationsSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207