MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2263505657 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2014.1138

Robust stochastic stability and delayed‐state‐feedback stabilisation of uncertain Markovian jump linear systems with random time delays

2015· article· en· W2263505657 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Markov processLinear matrix inequalityMathematicsStability (learning theory)Full state feedbackRobust controlLinear systemLyapunov functionState (computer science)Markov chainController (irrigation)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationControl systemControl (management)Nonlinear systemEngineeringAlgorithmStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of robust stochastic stability and delayed‐state‐feedback stabilisation of uncertain Markovian jump linear systems with random Markov delays is investigated. Based on the Lyapunov stability theory and robust analysis techniques, some robust stochastic stability criteria are derived in terms of linear matrix inequalities. Robust delayed‐state‐feedback controllers that stochastically stabilise the uncertain Markovian jump linear systems is also proposed. The state variable on the controller is assumed to be dependent on the Markov delay that has uncertain transition probabilities. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it