MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2266789660 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511721953.011

Biparental care and social evolution in burying beetles: lessons from the larder

2010· book-chapter· en· W2266789660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarrionBiologyPredationEcologyInterspecific competitionCompetition (biology)Paternal careZoologyOffspring

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae: Nicrophorus) exhibit elaborate biparental care. Males and females independently search for small vertebrate carcasses, which serve as the sole food source for developing young. Both parents prepare the carcass for burial, excavate a cavity in the carcass within which the young feed, provision the young during the early stages of their development, and protect them from conspecific and interspecific predators and competitors. Carrion is an extremely nutrient–rich resource, but it can vary greatly in quantity and quality, and owing to its rarity and ephemeral nature, its occurrence is highly unpredictable. We propose that many of the sexual and parental behaviors of Nicrophorus can be regarded as adaptations to the unique problems posed by these resource features. Competition for carrion is intense; consequently, traits that help reduce or eliminate competition, such as carcass burial, should increase reproductive success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it