MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2268071275

Theater as virtual reality

2014· book· en· W2268071275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueETC Press eBooks · 2014
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattlePresentation (obstetrics)Key (lock)Extension (predicate logic)Visual artsArtAestheticsHistoryMedia studiesLiteratureSociologyMedicineComputer scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For millennia, people have participated in and have attended theatrical performances. Early examples would have taken place around a fire and were likely to have portrayed the glories of the day's hunt, a battle against a neighboring village, or the complex and fascinating relationships between the gods. Before formal rules of theatre were established these performances would likely have been interactive. Audience members would have participated in the actual events being described, and could jump up and contribute (or be dragged in) to the presentation; children could ask questions, which could be answered immediately as an extension of the performance; audience members could shout and sing, in response to the prompting of the 'cast'; and so on. At these times an entire village could be engaged simultaneously. One imagines that there would be food and drink, perhaps music and dancing. It would be a key social activity for the village, as well as a way to transmit history and tradition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it