MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2268974334 · doi:10.1353/not.2016.0020

Barbara Hannigan: Concert Documentary by Barbara Hannigan, and: Lulu by Alban Berg (review)

2016· article· en· W2268974334 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNotes · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperaArtMacabreMOZARTArt historyGuitarPerformance artMusicalDoveVisual artsHumanitiesCartographyGeographyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Barbara Hannigan: Concert Documentaryby Barbara Hannigan, and: Luluby Alban Berg Morgan Rich Barbara Hannigan: Concert Documentary. DVD. Barbara Hannigan / Mahler Chamber Orchestra. Directed by Michael Beyer and Barbara Seiler. [Leipzig]: Accentus Music, 2014. ACC20327. $24.99. Alban Berg. Lulu. DVD. Paul Daniel / Orchestre Symphonique de la Monnaie. Directed by Krzysztof Warlikowski. With Barbara Hannigan, Natascha Petrinsky, Frances Bourne, Tom Randale, Dietrich Henschel, Charles Workman, Pavlo Hunka, Ivan Ludlow, et al.[Paris]: BelAir Classiques, 2014. BAC109. $29.99. Known for her vocal prowess and remarkable musicianship, Canadian coloratura soprano Barbara Hannigan demonstrates, in these two DVDs, that she is as comfortable performing Ligeti’s works as Mozart arias, but also just as comfortable conducting an orchestra as she is performing daring renditions of Lulu, on pointe, or Mysteries of the Macabre. The Concert Documentary DVD comes out of the 2014 Lucerne Festival and features the Mahler Chamber Orchestra. The program includes: Gioachino Rossini’s Overture to La scala di seta; Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart’s Vado, ma dove? O Dei!, Un moto di gioia, and Misera, dove son?; Gabriel Fauré’s Pelléas et Mélisande, op. 80; and Györgi Ligeti’s Con -cert Românescand Mysteries of the Macabre. The 2014 release of Luluwas filmed during the 19 and 26 October 2012 performances of the opera at La Monnaie in Brussels, under the direction of Krzystof Warlikowski and baton of Paul Daniel, featuring Hannigan in the title role. Hannigan’s performance of Ligeti’s Mysteries of the Macabreis the highlight of the Concert Documentary DVD. Ligeti’s Mysteries, three arias from his opera Le Grand Macabre(1974–77/96), was prepared for soprano and piano in 1992 by the composer and arranged by Elgar Howarth. Hannigan has made a name for herself with her twist on Mysteries, documented on this DVD by her experience as conductor, vocalist, and actress. The program as a whole highlights Hannigan’s vocal color and agility, but her Ligeti is a “must see” for vocalists or audiences interested in a performance representing the highest understanding of the intimate details of this masterpiece of twentieth-century music. This DVD offers an important look at what it means to be a versatile musician; Hannigan excels in conducting Ligeti’s little-performed Concert Românesc(1951/rev. 1996) along with performing and conducting Fauré, Mozart, and Rossini. For those who like to “get to know” performing artists, the documentary portion of the DVD, “I’m a creative animal,” provides footage of Hannigan discussing her background; views of her as a working, practicing, and a teaching musician; and scenes from her rehearsals at the 2014 Lucerne Festival as a conductor and as she prepared to perform Unsuk Chin’s “Le Silence des Sirènes” in the same summer. Hannigan’s hunger for new musical experiences and commitment to improving her artistic craft is evident in every scene. Krzysztof Warlikowski’s 2012 production of Alban Berg’s Lulu, featuring Hannigan as the title character, is provocative and at times, salacious. While all of the lead characters offer remarkable performances of their roles, especially Dietrich Henschel as [End Page 597]Dr. Schön/Jack the Ripper and Charles Workman as Alwa, Warlikowski’s production sensationalizes material that is already, by its nature, grotesque and sexy. He chose to infantilize Lulu, making her a victim of circumstances. He draws a literal relationship, on stage, by employing adolescent ballet dancers to represent the adult characters; this at times falls flat, and becomes extraneous stage fodder. Hannigan’s timbre and acting, however, sell the victimized, childlike aspect of Lulu. Her remarkable performance has her singing some of the most difficult vocal lines in Acts 1 and 2 on pointe, or while mimicking sex acts. The importance Warnikowski places on culturally coded references detracts from the material at hand, and often from the stellar performance by the performers. The use of classical ballet connects Lulu to Odette/Odile of Swan Lakeas well as Darren Arnofsky’s 2010 film Black Swan, associating the downfall of Lulu to the main character in the film, who loses her grip on reality and begins living a nightmare. The second inference (and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it