MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2269759485 · doi:10.1130/g36988.1

The impact of dynamic topography change on Antarctic ice sheet stability during the mid-Pliocene warm period

2015· article· en· W2269759485 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriod (music)ObservatoryHistoryArt historyGeologyLibrary scienceArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| October 01, 2015 The impact of dynamic topography change on Antarctic ice sheet stability during the mid-Pliocene warm period Jacqueline Austermann; Jacqueline Austermann * 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA *E-mail: jaustermann@fas.harvard.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David Pollard; David Pollard 2Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Jerry X. Mitrovica; Jerry X. Mitrovica 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Robert Moucha; Robert Moucha 3Department of Earth Sciences, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Alessandro M. Forte; Alessandro M. Forte 4Centre GEOTOP, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, H3C 3P8 Québec, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Robert M. DeConto; Robert M. DeConto 5Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David B. Rowley; David B. Rowley 6Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Maureen E. Raymo Maureen E. Raymo 7Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Jacqueline Austermann * 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA David Pollard 2Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA Jerry X. Mitrovica 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA Robert Moucha 3Department of Earth Sciences, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA Alessandro M. Forte 4Centre GEOTOP, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, H3C 3P8 Québec, Canada Robert M. DeConto 5Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA David B. Rowley 6Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA Maureen E. Raymo 7Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964, USA *E-mail: jaustermann@fas.harvard.edu Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 18 May 2015 Revision Received: 12 Aug 2015 Accepted: 13 Aug 2015 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online Issn: 1943-2682 Print Issn: 0091-7613 © 2015 Geological Society of America Geology (2015) 43 (10): 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1130/G36988.1 Article history Received: 18 May 2015 Revision Received: 12 Aug 2015 Accepted: 13 Aug 2015 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Jacqueline Austermann, David Pollard, Jerry X. Mitrovica, Robert Moucha, Alessandro M. Forte, Robert M. DeConto, David B. Rowley, Maureen E. Raymo; The impact of dynamic topography change on Antarctic ice sheet stability during the mid-Pliocene warm period. Geology 2015;; 43 (10): 927–930. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G36988.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract The evolution of the Antarctic ice sheet during the mid-Pliocene warm period (MPWP) remains uncertain and has important implications for our understanding of ice sheet response to modern global warming. The extent to which marine-based sectors of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) retreated during the MPWP is particularly contentious, with geological observations and geochemical analyses being cited to argue for either a relatively minor or a significant ice sheet retreat in response to mid-Pliocene warming. The stability of marine-based ice sheets is intimately linked to bedrock elevation at their grounding lines, and previous ice sheet modeling assumed that Antarctic bedrock elevation during the MPWP was the same as today with the exception of a correction for the crustal response to ice loading. However, various processes may have perturbed bedrock elevation over the past 3 m.y., most notably vertical deflections of the crust driven by mantle convective flow, or dynamic topography. Here we present simulations of mantle convective flow that are consistent with a wide range of present-day observables and use them to predict changes in dynamic topography and reconstruct bedrock elevations during the MPWP. We incorporate these elevations into a simulation of the Antarctic ice sheet during the MPWP and find that the correction for dynamic topography change has a significant effect on the stability of the EAIS within the marine-based Wilkes Basin, with the ice margin in that sector retreating considerably further inland (200–560 km) relative to simulations that do not include this correction for bedrock elevation. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it