The Ecumenical Legacy of the Second Vatican Council: A Disciples Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I. Introduction It was a real honor to be asked by the planning committee of the North American Academy of Ecumenists to offer a presentation during the 2012 Conference in Halifax on the ecumenical legacy of the Second Vatican Council from my perspective as a member of the Disciples of Christ. I wish to dedicate this address to the memory of our colleague and friend, Dr. Margaret O'Gara, who served since 1983 as a member of the International Commission for Dialogue between the Disciples of Christ and the Roman Catholic Church. She was a great scholar and contributor to our dialogue; indeed, she represented the best of Vatican II in opening a window to God's spirit in the pursuit of unity in truth and love. Over the past year as I prepared for this presentation, I have read a library shelf of books and documents about Vatican II (1962-65). I discovered a wealth of material written and published by Disciples, as we were included in Vatican II in that special category of delegated observers. One of the most helpful resources was an early issue of Mid-Stream, a journal produced by the Council on Christian Unity (where I now serve as President), that was published in the summer of 1966 (just a year-and-a-half after the close of Vatican II), which brought together a series of articles addressing the overall topic, Estimates of Vatican It was interesting to read these articles, beginning with statements by three Catholics (including J. G. M. Willebrands), then by two Protestant observers (Albert C. Outler and Douglas Horton), then estimates by the official observers of the Christian Churches (Disciples of Christ), and, finally, statements by leaders in conciliar ecumenism, including Nikos Nissiotis from the Orthodox perspective, Lukas Vischer (Swiss Reformed Church) on behalf of the World Council of Churches, and an Appraisal from the perspective of the National Council of Churches and its Faith and Order Commission by William Norgren of the Episcopal Church, U.S.A. As my first reflection on Vatican II's ecumenical legacy, I believe it established a benchmark on the way we would (or should!) do our ecumenical work, that is, including and engaging Christians of other traditions and churches to be part of the discussion and conversation, even in our internal work and deliberations. And, we should invite persons to share from the point of view of those most intimately involved--in this case, beginning with assessments by Catholics--and to listen first for understanding of others' positions before moving to express our own experiences, positions, or interpretations. I was tempted to synthesize these rich articles from Mid-Stream into a summary of common themes, issues, or topics. However, in going back through the statements, I found that approach to be unsatisfactory, because it would wash out some of the soaring language and images and stories in the articles, and it would not do justice to differences embedded in the diversity of perspectives represented. So, briefly, I want to share highlights from some of these different voices as they reflected on their experiences of Vatican II and as they projected those hopes and expectations into an ecumenical future. Then, I will draw together a series of reflections from the perspective of the Disciples of Christ on the legacy of Vatican II seen now from the vantage point of fifty years later. II. Highlights from My Reading. 1. In his reflections on the results of Vatican II, then-Bishop Willebrands, who at that time was the secretary of the Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity at the Vatican, stressed that [i]t may be interesting, and important, to study the development of theology between the announcement of the Council and its closure; or to evaluate the theological content of the conciliar discussions; but what the Roman Catholic must do, above all, is to accept gratefully and carry out courageously the task laid upon us by the Council. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".