MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2273501219 · doi:10.3917/qdm.153.0057

Ce que l’innovation doit a l’insecurité de l’emploi

2015· article· fr· W2273501219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuestion(s) de management · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude a pour but d’examiner la relation entre le comportement innovateur des employés et l’insécurité perçue de l’emploi. Elle part de l’hypothèse que l’insécurité perçue de l’emploi influence directement et indirectement, au travers des motivations des employés à innover, le comportement innovateur des employés. Les quatre hypothèses de cette recherche sont testées avec une approche quantitative. Un questionnaire a été adressé à un ensemble de 343 employés travaillant en France. En utilisant la méthode d’analyse d’équation structurelle, les résultats démontrent qu’au travers des attentes de gains en matière de performance et d’image, l’insécurité perçue de l’emploi réduit la motivation des employés à innover et par conséquent diminue leur comportement innovateur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it