MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2274022836

Non-compliance with Accounting Standard for Lease Transactions Views from East and West

2011· article· en· W2274022836 on OpenAlexaffabout
Audra Ong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management and Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAccounting and Organizational Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccountingLeaseCompliance (psychology)Work (physics)BusinessStructuringBalance sheetAccounting standardManagement accountingFinancial accountingBalance (ability)Accounting information systemFinanceEngineeringPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is argued that companies are structuring lease agreements so that leases can be classified as operating thus enhancing their financial results. The International Accounting Standards Board recently proposed that the present classification be removed and all leases would appear on the balance sheet. This paper compares the opinions of 63 qualified accountants in Canada and 54 qualified accountants in Malaysia on the present regulations and the possibility of abuse of present accounting standards. Canadian accountants are more likely to agree than Malaysian accountants that present standards are being abused and there is statistical support that accountants in Malaysia with shorter work experience are more likely to consider that the standard is abused than those with longer work experience. Reasons are suggested for these differences. The paper concludes by identifying potential avenues for further research which would extend our knowledge on the development and implementation of new standards and improve our understanding of the potential relationship between expressed opinions and the personal attributes of the respondents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Management and ResearchSame topicAccounting and Organizational ManagementFrench-language works237,207