Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep quasi-static cone penetration tests in saturated soils can develop large excess pore pressures. The level and sign of the excess pore pressures depend on the volume change characteristics, the strength and the permeability of the soil. The recent addition of pore pressure measurements during cone penetration testing adds a new dimension to the interpretation for geotechnical parameters. This report shows how the pore pressure measurements enhance the stratigraphic logging abilities of the cone penetration test. Calibrations performed on the cone penetrometer are used to show the importance of correcting bearing and friction measurements for pore pressure effects. As well as pore pressure effects the importance of procedure and equipment is discussed. The use of pore pressure dissipations recorded while penetration is halted is illustrated. Theoretical solutions for pore pressure decay rates are illustrated and results predicting the coefficient of consolidation are compared to laboratory measured values. The coefficient of consolidation predicted from decay rates is shown to compare well with laboratory measured values for the soil in the overconsolidated state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it