Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this thesis, we develop new data integration methods to better understand animal population dynamics. In a first project, we study the problem of integrating aerial and access data from aerial-access creel surveys to estimate angling effort, catch and harvest. We propose new estimation methods, study their statistical properties theoretically and conduct a simulation study to compare their performance. We apply our methods to data from an annual Kootenay Lake (Canada) survey. In a second project, we present a new Bayesian modeling approach to integrate capture-recapture data with other sources of data without relying on the usual independence assumption. We use a simulation study to compare, under various scenarios, our approach with the usual approach of simply multiplying likelihoods. In the simulation study, the Monte Carlo RMSEs and expected posterior standard deviations obtained with our approach are always smaller than or equal to those obtained with the usual approach of simply multiplying likelihoods. Finally, we compare the performance of the two approaches using real data from a colony of Greater horseshoe bats (emph{Rhinolophus ferrumequinum}) in the Valais, Switzerland. In a third project, we develop an explicit integrated population model to integrate capture-recapture survey data, dead recovery survey data and snorkel survey data to better understand the movement from the ocean to spawning grounds of Chinook salmon (emph{Oncorhynchus tshawytscha}) on the West Coast of Vancouver Island, Canada. In addition to providing spawning escapement estimates, the model provides estimates of stream residence time and snorkel survey observer efficiency, which are crucial but currently lacking for the use of the area-under-the-curve method currently used to estimate escapement on the West Coast of Vancouver Island.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.082 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".