MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2280158872 · doi:10.1177/1024529415580258

Neoliberalism and the convergence of nonprofit care work in Canada

2015· article· en· W2280158872 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCompetition & Change · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Work Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthosCare workConvergence (economics)WorkforceNeoliberalism (international relations)Work (physics)Public sectorSociologySocial justiceParticipant observationPublic relationsResistance (ecology)Political scienceEconomicsPolitical economyEconomic growthSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawing on two different sets of qualitative interview and participant observation data collected in Canada in 2012 and 2013, this article asks why the social justice/nonprofit ethos operates differently within two subsectors of care work in the nonprofit sector, namely within long-term care and social services. The article argues that various similarities exist across the two highly gendered work forces such as resistance and care for services users. Models such as New Public Management may be compelling further convergence; however, certain differences remain as well. The data presented in the article sustained that, in these care work sectors, New Public Management is an uneven and gendered project, simultaneously resisted and sustained through the gendered self-exploitation of the workforce and the roots from which each subsector developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it