MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281243741 · doi:10.1353/ari.2015.0026

Canadian Gothic: Literature, History and the Spectre of Self-Invention by Cynthia Sugars (review)

2015· article· en· W2281243741 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kailin Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueAriel · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory of literatureMythologyWrightScholarshipNarrativeLiteratureIndigenousNationalismPoetryHistoryWhite (mutation)ArtArt historyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Canadian Gothic: Literature, History and the Spectre of Self-Invention by Cynthia Sugars Kailin Wright (bio) Cynthia Sugars. Canadian Gothic: Literature, History and the Spectre of Self-Invention. Cardiff: U of Wales P, 2014. Pp. x, 291. US $150.00. Cynthia Sugars’ Canadian Gothic explores the ghosts of settlers past and how recent diasporic and Indigenous writers are unsettling their inherited traditions. Sugars argues that the use of the Gothic is a long-standing strategy for connecting the Old World and New World through shared literary mythologies and for infusing the untamable Canadian landscape with a narrativized past. This Gothic tradition, however, is founded on an exclusionary nationalism that renders non-white Anglo-Canadians as other. Building on her earlier work on the postcolonial Gothic and the unhomely, Sugars makes another significant contribution to the field of Canadian Gothic scholarship by examining the longstanding mutually constitutive relationship between Canadian nationalism, the land, and ghosts in a variety of literary genres. Canadian Gothic spans from the sixteenth to the twenty-first centuries to trace the Gothic literary tradition in what is now called Canada; the book is divided into seven chapters that not only offer a historical survey and an analysis of multiple genres but also explore the distinctions between Anglo-and French-Canadian Gothic narratives. Canadian Gothic ultimately establishes the persistent presence of ghosts and the Gothic in Canadian literature. Canadian Gothic begins by analyzing the often overlooked ghosts in two famous Canadian poems, Robert Service’s “The Cremation of Sam McGee” (1907) and John McCrae’s “In Flanders Fields” (1919). The Introduction then turns to a myriad of writers, such as Susanna Moodie, Duncan Campbell Scott, Robertson Davies, James Reaney, and Margaret Sweatman, among others, in order to argue that “from very early on the Gothic has held a precarious, even contradictory, position in Canadian literature” because Canada “had long been perceived as either a location of monstrous extremes or an empty terrain that was unhaunted by a historical tradition” (8). Ironically, as Sugars asserts, the absence of a Canadian past or mythology is conveyed through Gothic sensations of horrific newness. Chapter One delves deeper into Gothic absence and the paradoxical phenomenon of being haunted by a lack of ghosts. Using white European explorers’ encounters with the New World as case studies, the first chapter demonstrates how early explorers projected their psychic fears onto Indigenous peoples. The second chapter surveys the larger national investment in the Gothic tradition as a strategy for defining a Canadian identity. Sugars asserts that “settler Canadian literature has from its beginnings been [End Page 202] haunted by its efforts to ‘story’ itself” (50); in short, “The absence of the Gothic is aligned with a failure of poetry and a failure of imagination—more specifically with a failure to write Canada into history” (67). Sugars suggests that the Gothic not only captures the spectrality of a lacking Canadian national identity but also, as a form of artistic creation, offers a solution to this absence. While Chapter Two equates Canada’s lack of a national mythology with a lack of ghosts, Chapter Three develops an analysis of psychic projection by arguing that Anglo-Canadian writers started replacing the Indigenous other with a Francophone spectral threat. The third chapter nicely integrates the previous two chapters’ arguments of psychic projection and national identity by suggesting that Anglo-Canadian culture absorbs New France through fantasies of Gothic excess, thereby legitimating a “modern” Canadian culture through the archaic Gothic (106). Chapter Four extends the use of the Gothic as a method for substantiating a Canadian literary tradition by examining the insertion of settler or Aboriginal ghosts into the landscape as two strategies for “plac[ing] settler descendants as secure ‘inheritors’ of the land and its spirit” (109). Psychic projection rears its ugly head yet again as Sugars reveals how “settler displacement of Aboriginal culture turns First Nations communities into a mirror of White alienation” (141). The fifth chapter investigates the aftermath of colonialism and writers’ strategies for engaging with this troubled legacy. As a welcome complication of the book’s previous chapters, the final two chapters problematize the legacy of the Gothic tradition as a substantiation of white...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.019
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArielSame topicGothic Literature and Media AnalysisFrench-language works237,207