MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281687720 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r207-16

Comparing Rainfall Dependent Inflow and Infiltration Simulation Methods

2001· article· en· W2281687720 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsCapital Regional District
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflowInfiltration (HVAC)Environmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)StormwaterCombined sewerSurface runoffMeteorologyGeologyGeotechnical engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rainfall dependent inflow and infiltration (RDII) is a significant, though undesirable, component of the mban wet-weather water budget in many sanitary sewer systems. Costs and environmental damage attributable to RDII are significant. Costs may be accrued tluough increased treatment and conveyance cost-:, increased maintenance costs, and sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs ). To reduce these coste; and mitigate environmental damage, engineered solutions require estimations of the long-term characteristics of the RDII response to wet weather. This in turn requires estimation of the performance of the existing collection and treatment system, as well as the expected perfonnance of various possible solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it