MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283263606 · doi:10.4271/2007-01-0206

Effect of Reformer Gas on HCCI Combustion - Part II: Low Octane Fuels

2007· article· en· W2283263606 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionHomogeneous charge compression ignitionOctane ratingOctaneAutomotive engineeringNuclear engineeringMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceChemistryCombustion chamberEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) combustion offers high fuel efficiency and some emissions benefits. However, it is difficult to control and stabilize combustion over a significant operating range because the critical compression ratio and intake temperature at which HCCI combustion can be achieved vary with operating conditions such as speed and load as well as with fuel octane number. Replacing part of the base fuel with reformer gas, (which can be produced from the base hydrocarbon fuel), alters HCCI combustion characteristics in varying ways depending on the replacement fraction and the base fuel auto-ignition characteristics. Because fuel injection quantities and ratios can be altered on a cycle-by-cycle basis during operation, injecting a variable blend of reformer gas and base fuel offers a potential HCCI combustion control mechanism.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The basic diesel exhaust problem is a trade-off between unacceptable levels of NOx and particulate matter, so establishing an HCCI operating mode in a diesel engine is desirable since it simultaneously reduces those two pollutants. Modern diesels using a tightly controlled fuel injection system that allows for multiple, timed injections during each cycle can produce variable amounts of pre-mixture by early injection. Blending the base fuel with variable amounts of light reformer gas can affect HCCI combustion parameters and may provide an acceptable means of combustion control.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper examines the reformer gas effect on HCCI combustion of low octane number fuels, including primary reference fuels with 0 and 20 octane numbers. Experimental work was performed in a CFR engine modified for high mechanical compression ratio. A variable blend of base fuel with simulated reformer gas (75% H<sub>2</sub> / 25% CO) was used to alter the HCCI engine's combustion parameters and control combustion onset. PRF0 and PRF20 fuels contain mostly n-heptane so two-stage auto-ignitions were observed for both fuels. Replacing some base fuel with reformer gas generally expanded the engine operating range on the rich side and retarded combustion timing. The retarded ignition, coming despite the tendency of reformer gas to raise compression temperature, indicates that pre-flame chemistry is significantly altered. First stage heat release was reduced by increasing reformer gas content and it delayed the main stage of heat release. The capability to adjust HCCI ignition timing and heat release rate by varying the fraction of reformer gas offers a potential combustion control mechanism.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it