MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283536660 · doi:10.14288/1.0064840

Focus wave mode pulses from cylindrical apertures

2009· article· en· W2283536660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPulsed Power Technology Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus (optics)OpticsMode (computer interface)PhysicsAcousticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous works have shown that it is possible to create a pulsed beam of acoustic energy which maintains amplitude and beam width better than either conventional single frequency or wide-band beams of comparable frequency content. The reconstruction technique to date uses Helmholtz' approximation on a planar array composed of individually addressable elements. In this work, a new array geometry is studied. Simulated focused scalar fields representing approximations to the Focus Wave Modes (FWM) are generated from a finite cylindrical aperture. The driving functions are derived using Huygens' representation for an infinite cylindrical surface. Performance of this new launching scheme is compared to the planar array launch of FWMs and Gaussian pulses. Through the course of simulations, we illustrate how the array spacing or discretization and the surface truncation affect the reconstruction quality and performance. The influence of array size and shape defined by the ratio of length over radius on the spreading and attenuation of the radiated beam is studied. The beam width, amplitude and sidelobe intensity are compared to those obtained from a planar array. It is shown that the cylinder length can be truncated to a certain value, Z[sub pc1], without affecting the pulse reconstruction at the origin. A shorter array can also be used with some loss in reconstruction quality. The generated localized wave from the cylindrical aperture is also compared to the Gaussian pulse. It is shown that a sufficient cylinder length will generate a field with better quality close to the array and similar performance and quality for further distances than that synthesized by a planar array of the same radius. Finally we use an approximation of the source functions to solve the problem caused by space-time inseparability of localized waves. We show that it is possible to find a simple relation between the various functions that drive the array elements. Without affecting significantly the radiated field, this method reduces dramatically the number of independent generators that are necessary to launch the pulse. The pulse can be generated from a cylindrical aperture using a single generator—while for a planar array of the same radius, more than 4000 independent generators would be required to obtain a similar beam quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it