MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283615357 · doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e318246e879

A web-based model to support patient-to-hospital allocation in mass casualty incidents

2012· article· en· W2283615357 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsMichael Smith Health Research BCSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMass-casualty incidentPreparednessMedical emergencyProcess (computing)Emergency managementComputer scienceIncident managementPoison controlMedicineHuman factors and ergonomicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In a mass casualty situation, evacuation of severely injured patients to the appropriate health care facility is of critical importance. The prehospital stage of a mass casualty incident (MCI) is typically chaotic, characterized by dynamic changes and severe time constraints. As a result, those involved in the prehospital evacuation process must be able to make crucial decisions in real time. This article presents a model intended to assist in the management of MCIs. The Mass Casualty Patient Allocation Model has been designed to facilitate effective evacuation by providing key information about nearby hospitals, including driving times and real-time bed capacity. These data will enable paramedics to make informed decisions in support of timely and appropriate patient allocation during MCIs. The model also enables simulation exercises for disaster preparedness and first response training. METHODS: Road network and hospital location data were used to precalculate road travel times from all locations in Metro Vancouver to all Level I to III trauma hospitals. Hospital capacity data were obtained from hospitals and were updated by tracking patient evacuation from the MCI locations. In combination, these data were used to construct a sophisticated web-based simulation model for use by emergency response personnel. RESULTS: The model provides information critical to the decision-making process within a matter of seconds. This includes driving times to the nearest hospitals, the trauma service level of each hospital, the location of hospitals in relation to the incident, and up-to-date hospital capacity. CONCLUSION: The dynamic and evolving nature of MCIs requires that decisions regarding prehospital management be made under extreme time pressure. This model provides tools for these decisions to be made in an informed fashion with continuously updated hospital capacity information. In addition, it permits complex MCI simulation for response and preparedness training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it