MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288331063 · doi:10.14288/1.0050466

Dynamic properties of sands under cyclic torsional shear

2008· article· en· W2288331063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muthukumarasamy Uthayakumar

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyShear (geology)Geotechnical engineeringPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic properties of soils have to be well understood in order to assure stability and acceptable performance of soil structures under seismic and wave loadings. It has been found the two important dynamic properties - shear modulus and damping factor are complex functions of many variables. In order to study the influence of various factors on shear modulus and damping factor, drained cyclic torsion shear tests were carried out in the hollow cylinder torsion device using medium Ottawa A S T M C-109 sand. Effects of shear strain amplitude, stress history, effective mean normal stress (σ'm = l/3(σ-'1 +σ'2 + σ'3)), principal effective stress ratio (R = σ1/σ3), intermediate principal stress parameter (b = σ2 —σ3)/(σ1 — σ-3)), void ratio, number of cycles of loading are some of the factors studied in this thesis. During the application of cyclic shear stress σ'm ,R and b were kept constant at pre-selected values for each test. This technique allows to study the effect cr'm, R and b independently. For example, the effect of R on dynamic properties can be isolated by a series of tests on specimens that have identical σ'm and b but different levels of R and all parameters σ'm, R and b are held constant during cyclic shear application. It is shown that shear modulus increases with number of cycles of a constant amplitude cyclic shear stress when the induced shear strain is higher than a certain threshold value. The damping, however, decreases with number of cycles even at strain amplitudes less than this threshold value. There is also a threshold value of shear strain below which zero volumetric strain occurs due to cyclic shear loading, and hence no pore pressure would develop if cyclic loading was undrained. Effects of stage testing and small strain history on dynamic properties is shown to be insignificant. With decrease of void ratio, shear modulus increases and damping factor decreases. It is shown that for a given b, the void ratio factor F(e) = (2.17 —e)² ( l + e), collapses the modulus degradation curves obtained at different void ratios in to a single curve. For a given initial stress state and shear strain amplitude, shear modulus obtained at different R levels do not show any significant difference when R < 3. Damping factors, however, seems to be unaffected by the change in R at all R levels. When R < 3, shear moduli in triaxial extension condition (b = 1) are found to be less than those in triaxial compression condition (b = 0) and damping factors for b = 1 are higher than those for b = 0. Both triaxial compression and extension state of loadings yielded same values shear modulus and damping factors at large amplitude of shear strain at R = 3. Test results indicate that when b < 1, the dynamic properties are independent of intermediate principal stress. Effects of stress history due to decrease in R from 3 to 2, is significant only in the small strain range, and as the strain level increase, the effects of stress history diminishes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.138
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicGeotechnical and Geomechanical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207