MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289132816 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2015.7417836

A Hierarchical Architecture for Distributed EPCglobal Discovery Services

2015· article· en· W2289132816 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArchitectureService discoveryWorld Wide WebDistributed computingComputer networkWeb serviceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient and scalable information discovery is one of the most important services in any large- scale Internet of Things (IoT) application, particularly in the EPCglobal Network. Although a number of distributed architectures have been proposed in the literature, both their scalability and their lookup time efficiency remain vulnerable, mainly because of their reliance on flat Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Networking. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a hierarchical distributed architecture for EPCglobal Discovery Services, called HEDSA, which improves the scalability and the lookup time of the flat P2P architectures, represented by FEDSA. The idea behind the hierarchy concept of HEDSA is that any Electronic Product Code (EPC) can be mapped to one and only one country, which is the issuing country of the corresponding company prefix. An emulation of FEDSA and HEDSA has been implemented on Planetlab using Chord algorithm, the objective being to compare the scalability and the lookup time of the two architectures. Several experiments have shown that HEDSA is much more efficient, both in terms of the number of hops and the lookup time, than FEDSA. Therefore, HEDSA is more suitable for large-scale IoT discovery services applications, such as the EPCglobal Network, provided that the identifiers can be mapped to one and only one geographical location.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0120.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it