MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design Optimization of Rail Vehicles with Passive and Active Suspensions: A Combined Approach Using Genetic Algorithms and Multibody Dynamics

2002· article· en· W2291749284 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueVehicle System Dynamics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBombardier
KeywordsMultibody systemStability (learning theory)Genetic algorithmProcess (computing)EngineeringOptimal designAutomobile handlingRide qualityVehicle dynamicsSoftwareQuality (philosophy)Control theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARYA genetic algorithm (GA) is combined with a multibody dynamics software (A'GEM) in an effective approach to the design of rail vehicles with passive and active suspensions. The conflicting requirements of lateral stability, curving performance, and vertical ride quality are assessed using realistic multibody models from A'GEM, and the GA is used to solve the multi-criteria optimization problem with a relatively large number of design variables. Despite discontinuous lateral stability and ride quality objective functions with many local optima, the GA is able to find global solutions. In the process, the relative importance of different design variables are identified and the tradeoffs between different optimization criteria are clearly revealed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it