Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Facial reconstruction requires the use of various techniques to repair cutaneous defects. Sliding flaps, such as advancement and rotation flaps, typically result in tension alterations and skin redundancy, necessitating a secondary defect. OBJECTIVE: We describe a back cut technique that allows minimization of the scar line and appropriate placement of tension vectors in certain locations, which we call the crescentic back cut. METHODS: A patient with a surgical defect on his preauricular cheek is repaired by use of a rotation flap modified with a crescentic back cut. We briefly review the alternative methods for management of flap/defect discrepancies in rotation flaps. RESULTS: The crescentic back cut is simple to suture, can be adjusted in length and thickness to minimize pedicle transection, and keeps the scar short and within the relaxed skin tension lines. CONCLUSION: The crescentic back cut is a useful option to manage flap/defect discrepancies in rotation flaps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it