Novel Hilbert Spectrum-Based Specific Emitter Identification for Single-Hop and Relaying Scenarios
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel approach for specific emitter identification using Hilbert spectrum is proposed for both single-hop and relaying scenarios. In particular, two features, i.e., the energy entropy and color moments, are extracted from the Hilbert spectrum of the signal of interest as identification features. The spectrum is obtained through the Hilbert-Huang transform, which is a powerful tool for the analysis of non-linear and nonstationary signals by decomposing them into a set of intrinsic mode functions. The identification task is solved by applying the support vector machine. We further extend the identification problem to a relaying scenario, in which the fingerprint of different emitters may be contaminated by the relay's fingerprints. To the best of our knowledge, this case has not been investigated so far in the literature. At last, simulation results validate that the proposed approach can effectively cope with the specific emitter identification problems in both single-hop and relaying scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it