MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2293318262

Loss of agency as expression in avatar performance

2014· book· en· W2293318262 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueETC Press eBooks · 2014
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureAvatarAgency (philosophy)Expression (computer science)Context (archaeology)Focus (optics)PsychologyAestheticsHuman–computer interactionSociologyComputer scienceArtArtificial intelligenceHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines the role of agency as a tool for non-verbal communication in avatar performances staged in online multi-user virtual environments. These live online events have remediated established traditions of performance art and theatre practices into online spaces such as UpStage and Second Life. As with traditional performance forms, particular gestures within virtual worlds are also viewed by the local community as artistic. These gestures are frequently more abstract or codified than everyday gestures, changing their expressive value and significance. The authors focus on two avatar performances Lines (2009) and Spawn of the Surreal (2007), and explore the ways in which audience agency was manipulated in the creation of aesthetic experience. These artistic events demonstrate the strength of agency as an expressive tool and indicate an intriguing new direction for NVC research even outside of the performance context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it