MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pediatric Abdominal Trauma

2017· review· en· W2293636383 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Pediatric Reviews · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal Trauma and Injuries
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAbdomenLaparotomyDiagnostic peritoneal lavageAbdominal traumaSurgeryDamage control surgeryResuscitationEvisceration (ophthalmology)Pediatric traumaPacked red blood cellsPenetrating traumaBlunt traumaDamage controlAbdominal cavityBlood transfusionBluntPoison controlInjury preventionEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abdominal trauma is present in approximately 25% of pediatric patients with major trauma and is the most common cause of unrecognized fatal injury in children. Pediatric abdominal trauma is typically blunt in nature with the spleen being the most common organ injured. Nonoperative management is employed in over 95% of patients. Penetrating injuries are less common but often require operative management. Knowledge of specific mechanisms of injury aids the clinician in the diagnosis of specific injuries. Computed Tomography (CT) is the gold standard in the identification of intra-abdominal injury. Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) can detect the presence of free fluid suggestive of intra-abdominal injury. In children, the utility of FAST is limited because less than half of pediatric patients with abdominal injury have free fluid. Bowel perforation and pancreatic injuries may not be evident on initial CT scanning of the abdomen. Initial management of the trauma patient in shock includes fluid boluses of normal saline or Ringer's lactate with two, large-bore upper extremity catheters. Transfusion with packed red blood cells is done if the patient remains hypotensive after the second fluid bolus. Emergent laparotomy is indicated in patients with: free intraperitoneal air, hemodynamic instability despite maximal resuscitative efforts (transfusion of greater than 50% of total blood volume), gunshot wound to the abdomen or other penetrating traumas, and evisceration of intraperitoneal contents. Initial FAST followed by abdominal computed tomography is important in the evaluation of the seriously or critically injured patient. The combination of the FAST exam along with selected abdominal computed tomography can further aid in the detection of injuries that may not be clinically apparent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.391
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.112 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it