Admission Peripheral Edema, Central Venous Pressure, and Survival in Critically Ill Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: The clinical significance of peripheral edema has not been well described in critical illness. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical significance of peripheral edema detected on physical examination at the time of hospital admission for patients who were treated in an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Using a large inception cohort of critically ill patients, we examined the association of peripheral edema, as documented on hospital admission physical examination, with hospital and 1-year survival. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 12,778 patients admitted to an ICU at a teaching hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, 2,338 (18%) had peripheral edema. Adjusting for severity of illness and comorbidities, including pulmonary edema, admission peripheral edema was associated with a 26% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-1.44, P < 0.001) higher risk of hospital mortality. In those patients whose peripheral edema could be graded, trace, 1+, 2+, and 3+ admission peripheral edema was associated with a 2% (95% CI = 0.80-1.31, P = 0.89), 17% (95% CI = 1.00-1.56, P = 0.05), 60% (95% CI = 1.26-2.04, P < 0.001), and 54% (95% CI = 1.04-2.29, P = 0.03) higher adjusted risk of hospital mortality, respectively, compared with patients without edema. The association was consistent across strata of patients with diabetes, congestive heart failure, sepsis, and premorbid diuretic or calcium channel blocker use. In a subset of patients with central venous pressures measurements obtained within 6 hours of ICU admission, the highest central venous pressure quartile (>13 cm H2O) was similarly associated with a 35% (95% CI = 1.05-1.75, P = 0.02) higher adjusted risk of hospital mortality compared with the lowest quartile (≤7 cm H2O). CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral edema, as detected on physical examination at the time of hospital admission, is a poor prognostic indicator in critical illness. Whether peripheral edema simply reflects underlying pathophysiology, or has an independent pathogenic role, will require further interventional studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".