MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296571739 · doi:10.14288/1.0075042

Density, body condition, and movement of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki) in logged and forested headwater streams of southwestern British Columbia

2009· article· en· W2296571739 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTroutSTREAMSOncorhynchusFisheryGeographyEcologyEnvironmental scienceFish <Actinopterygii>Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coastal cutthroat trout (O. clarki clarki) rear in small, headwater streams that may be particularly susceptible to impacts from land-use activities such as logging. Headwater populations of coastal cutthroat trout were trapped from 1997 to 2002 to investigate: (i) the effects of second-growth logging on trout densities and summer body condition over summer and winter months; (ii) the influence of physical habitat characteristics on summer trout densities; and (iii) the characteristics of winter trout movement within different habitat conditions. Trout mean summer densities in logged streams showed no decline following harvest, nor were there any large changes evident to physical habitat. However, among years, mean summer trout densities were higher in streams with deeper pools. Though summer trout densities remained unchanged in logged streams, trout densities in control streams declined. This suggests that trout may actually have benefited from logging, potentially due to enhanced levels of primary productivity arising from the removal of riparian canopy. Winter trout densities were similar to summer values, indicating that these headwater streams provided suitable conditions for trout populations year-round. Low flows during late summer, which reduce pool depth, may be more limiting to age 1 and older cutthroat trout found in coastal headwater streams than winter high-flow events. Increases in stream temperatures following logging activities were not associated with enhanced summer body conditions of trout, largely because minor temperature effects of logging (average increases of 1-2° C) were offset by a colder-than-average post-logging period. Winter movement (average 2-7 habitat units or 21-40 m) was found to be a common behaviour of coastal cutthroat trout in headwater streams and did not seem to be mediated by dominance hierarchies, influenced by riparian forest condition, or confer a growth advantage/ disadvantage for trout. Winter movement, however, was somewhat limited and may be a reflection of the need for trout to seek deeper pool habitats that provide cover and refuge from high-discharge events. Land-use management practices that protect existing pools and facilitate the processes that create pools may ensure the continued persistence of coastal cutthroat trout populations in headwater streams of southwestern British Columbia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it