MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2297580086 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.040

An Application of Advanced Alarm Management Tools to an Oil Sand Extraction Plant∗∗This work was supported by an NSERC CRD project with Suncor Energy as an industrial partner.

2015· article· en· W2297580086 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsSuncor Energy (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsALARMRationalization (economics)Work (physics)EngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For better performance analysis and design improvement of industrial alarm systems, a variety of advanced alarm management tools have been developed recently. These tools are quite comprehensive and handy in various applications, such as the assessment of alarm systems, detection of nuisance alarms, alarm flood analysis, and recommendation of better configurations. To demonstrate the effectiveness of these tools, this paper presents some industrial case studies based on the alarm data collected from an oil sand extraction plant operated by Suncor Energy in northern Alberta, Canada. Application results show the practicality and utility of the advanced alarm management tools for alarm rationalization and routine alarm management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it