MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2297834093 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2016.2555929

Large- and Small-Signal Average-Value Modeling of Dual-Active-Bridge DC–DC Converter Considering Power Losses

2016· article· en· W2297834093 on OpenAlexafffund
Kai Zhang, Zhenyu Shan, Juri Jatskevich

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransfer functionSmall-signal modelConvertersLarge-signal modelTransformerControl theory (sociology)SIGNAL (programming language)Electronic engineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)EngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltagePhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Average-value modeling (AVM) provides an efficient way to study power electronic systems in large- and small-signal senses. This paper presents a new reduced-order AVM for dual-active-bridge dc-dc converters. The proposed model considers the conduction and transformer power losses as well as the input/output filters, which may be very useful for system-level studies. Based on the large-signal AVM, the small-signal model and the control-to-output transfer function are also derived. The proposed AVM is compared with the full-order generalized average model and the detailed model in predicting large-signal transients and small-signal analysis in the frequency domain. The experimental results confirm that the proposed model yields a high accuracy, which represents an improvement over other existing models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations205
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207