MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2298984676 · doi:10.4000/insitu.12648

Éphémères musées d’archéologie médiévale. La collection de moulages de l’humble M. Malzieux

2016· article· fr· W2298984676 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIn Situ · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesSculptureArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Demandée dès la constitution de la commission des Monuments historiques et rappelée au lendemain de la révolution de 1848, la création d’un musée de moulages de sculpture médiévale française ne fut décidée qu’en 1879, avec l’engagement de Jules Ferry en faveur du projet de musée de Sculpture comparée d’Eugène Viollet-le-Duc. Vingt-quatre ans plus tôt, l’architecte s’était fait le porte-parole d’un modeste mouleur, Auguste Malzieux. Viollet-le-Duc proposait de réunir au Louvre la formidable collection de Malzieux, composée d’estampages de sculptures françaises du XIe au XVIe siècle. Les historiographes ont généralement reconnu cette proposition comme une étape de la genèse du musée de Sculpture comparée, sans toutefois en estimer l’importance et la destinée. Centrée sur la personnalité d’Auguste Malzieux, cette recherche inédite révèle que les collections de cet illustre inconnu furent non seulement rassemblées au sein d’un éphémère « musée d’Archéologie du Moyen Âge », mais trouvèrent encore de nouvelles fortunes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it