Éphémères musées d’archéologie médiévale. La collection de moulages de l’humble M. Malzieux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Demandée dès la constitution de la commission des Monuments historiques et rappelée au lendemain de la révolution de 1848, la création d’un musée de moulages de sculpture médiévale française ne fut décidée qu’en 1879, avec l’engagement de Jules Ferry en faveur du projet de musée de Sculpture comparée d’Eugène Viollet-le-Duc. Vingt-quatre ans plus tôt, l’architecte s’était fait le porte-parole d’un modeste mouleur, Auguste Malzieux. Viollet-le-Duc proposait de réunir au Louvre la formidable collection de Malzieux, composée d’estampages de sculptures françaises du XIe au XVIe siècle. Les historiographes ont généralement reconnu cette proposition comme une étape de la genèse du musée de Sculpture comparée, sans toutefois en estimer l’importance et la destinée. Centrée sur la personnalité d’Auguste Malzieux, cette recherche inédite révèle que les collections de cet illustre inconnu furent non seulement rassemblées au sein d’un éphémère « musée d’Archéologie du Moyen Âge », mais trouvèrent encore de nouvelles fortunes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".