MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299951517 · doi:10.1680/jgeen.15.00171

Measurement of rail deflection on soft subgrades using DIC

2016· article· en· W2299951517 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Engineering and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTrack (disk drive)Displacement (psychology)TrainHigh-speed cameraDigital cameraDigital image correlationComputer visionDeflection (physics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceVibrationVideo cameraAcousticsMeasure (data warehouse)OpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The measurement of track displacement during the passage of a train is an important parameter for the assessment of track condition. Digital image correlation (DIC) is a non-contact camera-based technology that can be used to measure these displacements. However, ground vibrations induced by the train can result in camera movement, adding error to the measured displacement. This paper presents a two-camera method that can account for the camera movement when measuring track displacements using DIC. The method is validated on a stationary track and then used to measure track displacement during the passage of two trains travelling at different velocities. The results of the two-camera method are then compared to the track displacements found using a low-pass filter. The two-camera method was found successfully to reduce error due to camera movement while removing the subjectivity of choosing a cut-off frequency for filtering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it