Comparison of the Effectiveness of Option Price Forecasting: Black-Scholes vs. Simple and Hybrid Neural Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to forecast option prices with simple backpropagation neural networks and to compare the results between conventional Black-Scholes model, the Black-Scholes model with pure implied volatility and neural network models over a seven-year period. This longitudinal study used 64,280 OEX 100 index call option prices trading on the Chicago Board Options Exchange from January 1986 to June 1993. In addition to simple models, two hybrid models were constructed. Using optimal models in each sub-period, the following results are demonstrated: 1. neural networks outperform the conventional Black-Scholes model when using historical volatility as an input; 2. the Black-Scholes model has better predictability when implied volatility is used; and 3. the hybrid neural network model with implied volatility often outperforms the implied volatility version of the Black-Scholes model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.050 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it