MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2300270324 · doi:10.1002/admi.201500693

An Aqueous Process for Durable Superamphiphobic Diblock Copolymer Coatings on Fabrics

2016· article· en· W2300270324 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials Interfaces · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerGlycidyl methacrylateMaterials scienceAqueous solutionAcrylateMethacrylateAtom-transfer radical-polymerizationChemical engineeringPolymer chemistryPolymerizationEnvironmentally friendlyComposite materialPolymerOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many strategies have been developed to prepare superamphiphobic fabrics that strongly repel water‐ and oil‐borne contaminants and etchants. However, the common drawback in these reported strategies is the use of organic solvents, which should be eliminated or reduced for practical applications. In this paper, the diblock copolymer of poly(2‐perfluorooctylethyl acrylate)‐block‐poly(glycidyl methacrylate‐ radom‐methoxy oligoethyleneglycolyl methacrylate) [PFOEA‐b‐P(GMA‐r‐mOEGMA)]is synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization and used to coat cotton and poly(ethylene terphthalate) fabrics from an aqueous process. It is found that fabrics with tunable and robust wettablity can be prepared from copolymer solution at different concentrations. For example, fabrics coated at a copolymer solution concentration of 22.8 mg mL‐1 are superamphiphobic. This process of current stratey is environment‐friendly, simple, and reproducible, and may find commercial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it