MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2300270324 · doi:10.1002/admi.201500693

An Aqueous Process for Durable Superamphiphobic Diblock Copolymer Coatings on Fabrics

2016· article· en· W2300270324 on OpenAlexaff
Hailiang Zou, Shudong Lin, Yuanyuan Tu, Fei Li, Jiwen Hu, Guojun Liu, Shengyu Hu, Gonghua Yang, Zhiwei Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials Interfaces · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerGlycidyl methacrylateMaterials scienceAqueous solutionAcrylateMethacrylateAtom-transfer radical-polymerizationChemical engineeringPolymer chemistryPolymerizationEnvironmentally friendlyComposite materialPolymerOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many strategies have been developed to prepare superamphiphobic fabrics that strongly repel water‐ and oil‐borne contaminants and etchants. However, the common drawback in these reported strategies is the use of organic solvents, which should be eliminated or reduced for practical applications. In this paper, the diblock copolymer of poly(2‐perfluorooctylethyl acrylate)‐block‐poly(glycidyl methacrylate‐ radom‐methoxy oligoethyleneglycolyl methacrylate) [PFOEA‐b‐P(GMA‐r‐mOEGMA)]is synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization and used to coat cotton and poly(ethylene terphthalate) fabrics from an aqueous process. It is found that fabrics with tunable and robust wettablity can be prepared from copolymer solution at different concentrations. For example, fabrics coated at a copolymer solution concentration of 22.8 mg mL‐1 are superamphiphobic. This process of current stratey is environment‐friendly, simple, and reproducible, and may find commercial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Materials InterfacesSame topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207