MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2300776585 · doi:10.14288/1.0050150

Seismic behaviour of steel plate shear walls by shake table testing

2009· article· en· W2300776585 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarthquake shaking tableShakeShear (geology)Shear wallGeologyStructural engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation describes an experimental and analytical study on the behaviour of steel plate shear walls with thin unstiffened webs when used as primary lateral load resisting system in medium- and high-rise buildings. The steel plate shear wall system resembles a vertical plate girder where the theoretical buckling strength of the plate panels is negligible and lateral loads are carried through post-buckling strength of the plate panels in combination with the frame action of the surrounding beams and columns. The theory that governs the design of steel plate shear wall structures is essentially the same as that of plate girders developed by Basler in 1961, although the relatively high bending strength and stiffness of the beams and columns have a significant effect on the overall behaviour, especially when high axial forces and overturning effects dominate the behaviour of the system. To verify the guidelines and design principles provided in the latest version of Canada's National Standard on Limit States Design of Steel Structures, CAN/CSA-S16.1-94 (1994), and to broaden the scope of the code, an experimental testing program accompanied by numerical investigation was conducted at the University of British Columbia. This effort was in collaboration with researchers at the University of Alberta and a team of consulting engineers. During the first phase of the experimental program two single storey single bay specimens were tested cyclically to gain information on the general behaviour of the system and verify the adequacy of fabrication procedures. In the second phase, a single bay four-storey 25% scale specimen was tested under a quasi-static cyclic testing protocol. As the third phase of testing, a similar four-storey specimen was tested on the shake table under low, medium and intense dynamic horizontal base motions. The two single storey and one four-storey test specimens were loaded to maximum displacement ductilities of 7 x δƴ, 6 x δƴ and 1.6 x δƴ, during the first and second phases of testing, respectively. The single storey specimens proved to be very stiff, compared to the bare frame, showed good ductility and energy dissipation characteristics, and exhibited stable behaviour at very large deformations following many cycles of loading. Sufficient data was gathered to establish the overall performance of these structural systems under lateral loading. For the third phase of testing the dynamically tested four-storey specimen was subjected to a number of site-recorded and synthetically generated ground motions with varying intensities. Even though each test gave important information about the dynamic behaviour of the scaled steel plate shear wall specimen, the limited capacity of the shake table prevented the attainment of significant inelastic response in the specimen. Results from the scaled steel plate shear wall tests were used to verify numerical models and to gain an understanding of how the various methods of modelling the shear resistance of thin infill plates would affect the predicted results. In general, the code prescribed strip models overpredicted the elastic stiffness of the test specimens, while the yield and ultimate strength were reasonably well predicted. The load-deformation behaviour of the specimens was considerably affected by small variations of the angle of inclination of the tension struts representing tension field development. The discrepancies between the analytical and experimental results was more dramatic for the four-storey specimen than the single storey specimens. This was deemed to be a function of the overall aspect ratio (total height over panel width) of the specimen. For the four-storey specimens the higher moment to base shear ratio emphasized flexural deformations compared to storey shear behaviour. An improved numerical model was proposed that utilizes discrete strips placed at different angles. A semi-empirical equation was proposed to determine the effective width of the steel panels in resisting storey shears. The proposed model predictions were in good agreement with the envelope of cyclic and dynamic time-history test results obtained from experimental studies at the University of British Columbia and University of Alberta. [Scientific formulae used in this abstract could not be reproduced.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it