MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2302178357 · doi:10.2118/175573-ms

Development of Parallel Reservoir Simulators on Distributed-memory Supercomputers

2015· article· en· W2302178357 on OpenAlexafffund
Hui Liu, Kun Wang, Zhangxin Chen, Jia Luo, Shuhong Wu, Baohua Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesWestern Canada Research GridCMG Reservoir Simulation FoundationUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityWorkstationDistributed memoryParallel computingReservoir simulationGridVisualizationComputational scienceDistributed computingShared memoryOperating systemPetroleum engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents our work on developing parallel reservoir simulators for improving oil recovery on distributed-memory parallel systems and studying the scalability of our parallel reservoir simulators. The reservoir simulators are based on our in-house parallel platform, PRSI (Parallel Reservoir Simulation Infrastructure), which provides grid, data, linear solvers, preconditioners, distributed matrix and vector management, well modeling and visualization support. Based on this platform, a black oil simulator and a thermal simulator have been implemented. Benchmarks show that our parallel simulators are thousands of times faster than sequential simulators that designed for workstations and personal computers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and ExhibitionSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207