MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2302178357 · doi:10.2118/175573-ms

Development of Parallel Reservoir Simulators on Distributed-memory Supercomputers

2015· article· en· W2302178357 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesWestern Canada Research GridCMG Reservoir Simulation FoundationUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityWorkstationDistributed memoryParallel computingReservoir simulationGridVisualizationComputational scienceDistributed computingShared memoryOperating systemPetroleum engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents our work on developing parallel reservoir simulators for improving oil recovery on distributed-memory parallel systems and studying the scalability of our parallel reservoir simulators. The reservoir simulators are based on our in-house parallel platform, PRSI (Parallel Reservoir Simulation Infrastructure), which provides grid, data, linear solvers, preconditioners, distributed matrix and vector management, well modeling and visualization support. Based on this platform, a black oil simulator and a thermal simulator have been implemented. Benchmarks show that our parallel simulators are thousands of times faster than sequential simulators that designed for workstations and personal computers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it