MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2309824955 · doi:10.1177/0142331215583328

A new approach for adaptive sliding mode control: Integral/exponential gain law

2015· article· en· W2309824955 on OpenAlexaff
Jiang Zhu, Karim Khayati

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Integral sliding modeSliding mode controlNonlinear systemExponential functionTransient (computer programming)Reduction (mathematics)Mode (computer interface)Controller (irrigation)High-gain antennaComputer scienceAdaptive controlTransient responseMathematicsControl (management)EngineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new approach for adaptive sliding mode controller (ASMC) designs. The goal is to obtain robust, smooth, and fast transient performance for nonlinear systems with finite uncertainties of unknown bounds and limited available inputs so that the phenomena of the slow response and the gain overestimation in most ASMC designs can be greatly improved. Sufficient and necessary conditions for the existence of a sliding mode in the ASMC designs are discussed. Based on the sufficient conditions, we introduce an integral/exponential adaptation law targeting the reduction of the chatter levels of the sliding mode by significantly reducing the gain overestimation while simultaneously speeding up the system response to the uncertainties. An illustrative example and numerical simulations are performed to convey the discussed results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and ControlSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207