MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312336630 · doi:10.2514/6.2011-6295

Persistent Tracking using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: A Game Theory Method

2011· article· en· W2312336630 on OpenAlexaff
Mingfeng Zhang, Hugh H. T. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGuidance and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTracking (education)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceGame theoryAeronauticsEngineeringMathematicsMathematical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persistent tracking is of vital importance to a broad range of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) missions such that persistent observation and surveillance are indispensable for obtaining uninterrupted measurements of targets of interest. This paper studies the problem of persistent tracking, the goal of which is to design a control strategy for a UAV to keep a moving target in its detection zone, regardless of the target motion. In this paper, persistent tracking problem is formulated in the framework of pursuit-evasion game theory. A bounded and closed region around the UAV in which persistent tracking is feasible is determined rst in this framework. A switching tracking algorithm for the UAV to achieve persistent tracking is then formulated. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the performance of the proposed tracking algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control ConferenceSame topicGuidance and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207