MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313066366 · doi:10.1386/public.24.47.142_1

Colin Low and Transitions 3D: Innovating immersive cinema

2013· article· en· W2313066366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterExhibitionPerspective (graphical)AnimationIdeologyStereoscopyVisual artsSubject (documents)Space (punctuation)Film studiesArtSociologyAestheticsMedia studiesComputer sciencePolitical sciencePoliticsLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Transitions 3D is significant to film scholars because it is the first stereoscopic live-action IMAX film. The film also anchors important histories of Canadian film innovation and culture. From a technical perspective these histories include the development of large format cinema cameras and projection systems, early computer animation, and immersive cinema exhibition architecture. From a cultural perspective, Transitions 3D was the culmination of a prolific and wide flung collaboration of Canadian film-makers and technologists that was forged in response to the cultural mandates of the NFB and the national showcase agendas of successive world expositions. Low’s nuanced modernist ideology coupled with his sustained artistic and technical experimentation were central to these developments, driven in particular by his quest for an immersive cinema that would unite the film viewer and film subject in a stereoscopic cinematic space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it