Evaluation of Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate Dosing Strategies in the Inpatient Management of Hyperkalemia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia occurs frequently in an inpatient setting, for which sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) is a common treatment modality. Few studies have investigated the dose-response of SPS. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the change in serum potassium after 15-, 30-, and 60-g oral and 30-g rectal doses of SPS. Secondary objectives were to compare the proportion of patients attaining post-SPS dose normokalemia between dosing groups and to investigate the effect of certain characteristics on SPS dose-response. METHODS: The reduction in serum potassium after 15-, 30-, and 60-g oral and 30-g rectal doses of SPS administered to adult inpatients was evaluated through a retrospective chart review. Ottawa Hospital Research Ethics Board approval was obtained prior to data collection. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included in the analysis. Serum potassium levels were reduced by 0.39, 0.69, 0.91, and 0.22 mEq/L following 15-, 30-, and 60-g oral doses and a 30-g rectal dose of SPS, respectively. A greater proportion of patients (50% vs 23%) remained hyperkalemic in the 15-g versus the 60-g group (P = 0.018), and all patients in the rectal group remained hyperkalemic. No patient in any group experienced postdose hypokalemia. The influence of all studied interindividual characteristics on SPS dose-response was clinically nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: Mild hyperkalemia can be effectively treated with a single 60-g oral dose of SPS as monotherapy, with minimal risk of hypokalemia. Moderate to severe hyperkalemic episodes warrant alternative therapy. The potassium-lowering effect is correlated to SPS dose and is independent of interindividual characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it