Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| May 01, 2013 Field Geophysics, Fourth Edition John Milsom; John Milsom Waterloo Geophysics, 386 Parkgreen Place, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 5S6 and University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Asger Eriksen Asger Eriksen Waterloo Geophysics, 386 Parkgreen Place, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 5S6 and University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2013) 19 (2): 205–206. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.19.2.205 Article history first online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation John Milsom, Asger Eriksen; Field Geophysics, Fourth Edition. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 2013;; 19 (2): 205–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.19.2.205 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyEnvironmental & Engineering Geoscience Search Advanced Search Review by: Peeter E. Pehme The authors' (Milsom and Eriksen, 2011) declared intent is to create a handbook oriented to the field application of geophysics; this they have accomplished well. The focus of the text is on engineering and mining applications of geophysical techniques. The book is organized by technology rather than by application. Most common geophysical techniques—magnetics, electromagnetics, gravity, ground penetrating radar (GPR), and seismic—are covered. A few specialized technologies that are currently popular, such as magnetotellurics, radiological surveys, are also included. The phraseology is very readable with a hint of humor, terms are well explained, and... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.359 | 0.274 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".