Control Allocation-based Fault-tolerant Control for Over-actuated Systems with Saturation and Imperfect Fault Information
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To guarantee the stability of the over-actuated systems in the presence of actuator faults, saturation and imperfect fault information, two different design methods based on control allocation are provided in this paper, which can estimate optimally the attraction domain of the closed-loop system. By exploiting virtual control concept and adopting the pseudo inverse method for control allocation, the bound of difference between virtual control and desired virtual control is estimated, given a bounded fault diagnosis error. Then, a saturating linear system with bounded disturbance is constructed for the design of the baseline controller, and the attraction domain of the overall system is approached with the ellipsoidal set by state feedback. Two different forms of state feedback are discussed in details for the design of the baseline controller. Finally, the ADMIRE aircraft model is used to test the design techniques. The simulation results demonstrate that the two design methods can cope with the given actuator faults effectively and the stability of the closedloop system can be guaranteed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it